[rick bell]

Originally Posted by Roger

Trolling? On the contrary, I was making I believe a fair comparison on how "performance and power" are very subjective and as such are often times misunderstood when related to "work performed" by a particular aircraft.

It would be my contention that 337's are very powerful as per the common demands typically placed on aircraft, and as defined by Webster: powerful: producing great physical effects, having great effectiveness, etc..

Not to be confused with aircraft that for example may have more "horsepower", and are as such considered more "powerful" based entirely on that criteria, irrespective of what said "horespower actually provides in speed/load factor.

it was a joke