Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 01-08-05, 06:54 PM
Richard Richard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 210
Richard is an unknown quantity at this point
Prop Extension

Since we will have our electric props STC'd here pretty soon. I was thinking of adding a change and needed some feedback on it. Since we don't need any oil, I was thinking of adding a 3-6" prop extension on the rear motor?

Last edited by Richard : 01-09-05 at 03:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 01-09-05, 11:07 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,261
hharney is on a distinguished road
ARE YOU REFERRING TO THE BLADES?
DIAMETER?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 01-09-05, 11:34 PM
Richard Richard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 210
Richard is an unknown quantity at this point
Prop hub. Extending the prop away from the flange 3 to 6 inches. Getting the prop away from the wash coming off the fuselage.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 01-10-05, 11:44 AM
337G 337G is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 37
337G is an unknown quantity at this point
prop extension

how does extending the prop away from the fuselage improve things?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 01-10-05, 12:45 PM
Jim Rainer's Avatar
Jim Rainer Jim Rainer is offline
Jim Rainer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 163
Jim Rainer is an unknown quantity at this point
Good question. I believe the rear engine climbs better than the front because the air coming over the cabin and rear engine stays attached, therefore less wash and turbulence??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 01-10-05, 12:47 PM
Jim Rainer's Avatar
Jim Rainer Jim Rainer is offline
Jim Rainer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 163
Jim Rainer is an unknown quantity at this point
Also, if you are about to complete your STC, you'd have to include the prop extension (and probably do some extensive testing??)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 01-10-05, 04:41 PM
Guy Paris's Avatar
Guy Paris Guy Paris is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashua NH. (near ASH)
Posts: 266
Guy Paris is an unknown quantity at this point
Cool Compression factor..

If I remember correctly, the rear is more efficient because it does not have to contend with the air compressing against the cowl as the front engine does.. guy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 01-10-05, 07:04 PM
Richard Richard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 210
Richard is an unknown quantity at this point
Yep, we would have another 3 months of testing. I'd rather do it all in one step then having to start from scratch. (new STC for the extension). If it would offer a great benefit then we will start testing again. If not, then we will continue on the current path.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 01-10-05, 11:29 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,261
hharney is on a distinguished road
WITH THE MT PROPS THAT I HAVE THERE IS A PROP EXTENSION ON THE REAR. I AM NOT SURE THE EXACT LENGTH BUT I WOULD SAY IT IS ABOUT 3 - 4 INCHES. I WAS NOT QUITE CLEAR ON WHY IT WAS THERE WHEN THE PROPS WERE INSTALLED BUT I WILL QUESTION MT AND REPORT THEIR REASON.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.