![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Tables for 74 P337 vs Riley Super SkyRocket
I have taken the book figures to make a couple of Excel spreadsheets for performance tables comparing a 1974 T337G to Riley's Super SkyRocket conversion with the TSIO520's. The book figures only show MPH and LBs of fuel burned and total range exhausting fuel (which is a misleading figure). These tables add Knots, gallons per hour and range with 45 minute and 1 hour reserves. The 74 SkyMaster carried 123 gallons/738 lbs while the Super SkyRocket carries 148 usable/888 lbs.
I turned the excel files into pdf files since they didn't want to upload. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Curious, why the choice of 2200 RPM?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
2200 rpm is the max continuous rpm after initial takeoff and climb as well as cruise in the Riley Super SkyRocket. I know... interesting.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Learn something new everyday!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting, thanks. The P337 values are very similar to what I've experienced with my '73 P337 so far. The Rocket seems to have a significantly increased fuel burn for a modest increase in speed. I guess one other factor is it gets up to altitude quicker.
DD
__________________
1973 T337G |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
The STC only allows full power, which is 300 hp, not 310 like the same engine in 340. 38"@2,600rpm for 2 minutes. Then 34"@2200rpm for max continuous (which ironically is 225 hp). The other interesting factor I discovered is the AD for the engine back in 2009 instructing to NOT operate at rpm's below 2,300 for cruise. If I can get a chance to talk to a Super SkyRocket pilot I can ask if they use something other than the 2,200 which the Riley POH calls for.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|