Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 06-02-10, 07:31 PM
BrentH BrentH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 4
BrentH is an unknown quantity at this point
Just an opinion...

It's been many years since I went through the Crash Survival Investigators School and did aircraft crash investigations but as I remember, when the props are bent back like the front prop is, that says it was windmilling. When the blades are bent forward, that says that the prop was producing power. Could be wrong but if you play the odds, this fellow ran out of fuel. We'll see what NTSB come up with.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 06-03-10, 09:47 PM
WebMaster's Avatar
WebMaster WebMaster is offline
Web Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,524
WebMaster is on a distinguished road
Fuel

Either that, or he had a blockage that stopped both engines??

Nope, don't like that idea, either.

NTSB report should be interesting. I note that while the wing was ripped off, the wing attach point was still visible on the fuselage. Maybe Cessna will note that, as well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 06-03-10, 10:14 PM
Roger's Avatar
Roger Roger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FL-NY
Posts: 211
Roger is an unknown quantity at this point
I wonder how cold it was ? maybe it was like the one that went down over the frozen atlantic with "both engines" freezing at exactally the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 06-14-10, 08:41 PM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 431
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
I am finding it curious that the NTSB has not posted any preliminary report on this accident as of yet. Normally it does not take this long to post. Anyone have any input on this?

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 07-11-10, 11:00 PM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 431
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
The preliminary report is available at http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...27X05635&key=1

This plane had some serious rear engine problems but the front engine appeared healthy.

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 07-12-10, 02:03 PM
Roger's Avatar
Roger Roger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FL-NY
Posts: 211
Roger is an unknown quantity at this point
OK I'm going to go way out on a limb here: I wonder why both engines were "running" off the right tank? and also wonder why all of the controls were full forward, when the rear was in feather? I also wonder how an engine that fails and ends up being very corrodedd could be full of water.


One way could of course be that this aircraft was never operating on both engines. maybe it took off and was flown with just a front engine. Was it being repositioned for an engine replacement?

Of course the rear could have gone into feather if all the oil blew out, but the report says it was full of oil (and water).

How many people out there fly their aircraft on short flights with both engines running off the same tank ? I don't see a viable reason for it.

This is a very strange accident, and this kind of accident continues to add to the niss-information out there about these aircraft.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.