![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: ![]() |
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
these fat broads trim out beautiful and only need a nudge now and then you never would put a harness on your spouse when a little tender nudge will do. but what do i know |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Can't disagree with that observation. When I picked up my airplane after purchase, ferried it from Indianapolis back to Mass., just shy of 5 hours en route. Tried the A/P briefly just for fun but hand flew most of it and ate lunch along the way. And our surveys can go up to 5 hours and on the straight & level portions it pretty much flies itself. They do trim out beautifully - if they're rigged OK.
Joe |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Used Auto Pilot Questions
Okay guys- I understand it trims "beautifully". I fly for the Civil Air Patrol were most of my flying is two plus hours shuttling aircraft to and from maintenance. It's nice to set the old auto (it only has heading axis) and enjoy the flight and eat my lunch, knowing my return trip will be without an auto and having to make many stop along the way. I just figured with having a powerful twin, it would be nice to have an auto to help the flight along.
Thanks for the replies. BILLS (NEWBY SKYMASTER OWNER) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The skymaster is a powerful twin?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
powerful twin
TO: sns3guppy
Yes-for a single Cessna driver A Skymaster would be a powerful twin to me. BILLS |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I guess I'm not seeing it. Many light twins exceed the Skymaster in performance and power. The C337 is a great little airplane, but it's neither powerful nor a top performer.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|