![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: ![]() |
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ernie
Great answer, I certainly understand the concept of unintended consequences. Herb, I have seen some of the Riley's for sale, thanks. Ernie, do you feel the Riley's fit into your above reply too? Thanks guys |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I have never looked at or know much about the Riley, so I don't have an opinion. Of the large-scale STCs for the Skymaster it seems to have been the most successful. Perhaps it's a question you should pose to others in this forum with Riley experience. If you get a large enough sample (say, 10?) and it's predominantly positive, then I would consider it. But make no mistake, for me it would always be second-fiddle to a well-maintained standard Skymaster, because for the flying I do (no mountains, short hops) a Riley would add little. For others a Riley may provide a significant benefit, and should be considered if owners with Riley experience are generally satisfied.
Ernie |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry to beat a dead horse, but another point occurred to me. If you limit yourself to adding a bigger engine, what useful load are you left with? Might your aircraft, certified for 6 people, become a two seater? It's not just the heavier engine but the additional fuel required.
Ernie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ernie
I totally see your points, of course everything is a trade off. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|