![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
That makes sense now Russ. Using the existing antennas to activate the TCAS on the new L3 unit. If that works that would be great. Hoping it all comes together for you
__________________
Herb R Harney 1968 337C Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think the real question now is,
"Do enough aircraft now have ADS-B out to become reliably and directly visible to other aircraft, in areas of no ADS-B ground stations?" My Ryan is sick, and I am wrestling weather or not to fix it for $4k (About what it cost to install, BTW). 9900 BX TCAS (AVIDYNE) For years I have had a 9900BX which interrogates ALL 1090 traffic within 30 miles, and a pleasant little voice that tells me if anything is interesting. It is like having built-in radar flight following. The interrogating 9900BX (or re-labelled Avidyne) sees EVERYTHING that emits 1090Mhz, Mode S AND Mode C. NGT9000 I understand the NGT9000 has a golden-screwdriver unlock that interrogates like the TCAS. When I checked into it, it also requires a $3k Skywatch antenna. Open to updates~! == ADS MOOSH The evolution of these programs has created a mish mash. While you get a lot of data, you really don't know what's missing. It is a cloud of visible and missing targets. Go back to elementary school Venn diagrams. (Wild top-of-head approximations here): 98% of airliners have BASIC 1090 Mode S transponders 1090 MHz Invisible to 978Mhz UAT Invisible to 'dual mode' 1090 listening devices (because no position info in C or S) Only visible in ADSB world if Ground based radar observes and ADSB ground station sends back out 2% of airliners have Mode S extended squitter ADSB 1090 Mhz Invisible to 978Mhz UAT Visible to 'dual mode' 1090 (Because extended HAS position info) Airliners fly IFR so for the most part ARE visible to radar so WILL be sent out from ground ADS stations, if YOU are within station range. Otherwise one can pass off your nose and ALL our black boxes will never see it, EXCEPT an interrogating Ryan or NGT 9000. 70% of GA aircraft have ADS-B out UAT 978 Mhz Invisible to TCAS 1090 MHz Visible to RADAR if within radar coverage Visible to UAT IN 978 MHz 5% of GA aircraft have ADS-B out Mode S extended 1090 Mhz Invisible to UAT in, unless observed and relayed by ground station === Mode S = aircraft ID, Altitude, squawk = no position Mode C = altitude, squawk Mode S Ext= aircraft, altitude, squawk & ads-B = position UAT OUT= 978 Mhz = blind to the entire 1090 world w/o nearby ADS ground station UAT IN = 978 Mhz = blind to the entire 1090 world w/o nearby ADS ground station Dual Mode = Listens on 978 UAT and 1090 (but only sees Mode S extended w position) Airlines have been exempted from ADS-B Mode S extended squitter, so don't hold your breath to seeing them on your UAT IN anytime soon. == Funding for ADS B was justified by FAA (and the USAF) as a way to get the private sector to buy the replacement for areas of dying FAA radars. So it has lots of holes. And likely to stay that way. USAF is trying to get control of the $15b from the spectrum sale of 5G to put in more radars Which might, or might not happen. So CONUS coverage might get better IF USAF feeds that data to FAA for distribution over ground stations. So down low, or out of ground-station coverage, TCAS the only way to go. There may be lots of traffic, but you may be missing a lot of it. What a mess!
__________________
David Wartofsky Potomac Airfield 10300 Glen Way Fort Washington, MD 20744 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
TCAS continued
Thanks for the info David.
If you have the Ryan 9900bx already installed, don’t you already have multiple antennas to support it? Do you know if they can be re-purposed to support an NGT 9000? I was under the impression they could and that was my plan. One thing you didn’t mention is the satellite-based reporting for ADS-B. I thought I read somewhere that there would be sufficient coverage for that system in 2020? Reading the NGT 9000 manual, software to omit targets that present no threat seems to be a specific intent of the NGT 9000. I noticed flying the last few days that my iPad with ForeFlight attaches to the NGT 9000 WiFi, has a lot more contacts than on the NGT 9000 itself. I also noticed the ForeFlight displays 10m accuracy on the iPad when I’m using the 9000, but alone with its internal antenna, the iPad claims 5 m (and down to 1M with my Stratus 2s). I guess I’ll find out more in April during the actual installation. Russ N8CV |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|