new to the group

[n86121]

Your State law MAY require public-use airports have the name of based aircraft insurance on file. Many airports don't even record it.

That said, there is no audit process or enforcement mechanism, against either the airport or the aircraft owner.

If you provide the name of an insurance company, the airport's legal requirements are fulfilled.

--

Years ago a friend was a sr exec for a major defense firm.
Their policy was their execs could NOT fly their own GA.
He realized he could never get permission or waiver.
He kept thinking this was a barrier. He'd always get upset and angry.

No. Think it through.
Asking approval or permission creates liability, and can be a cowardly act.

Gen Grant was the first US General NOT to ask for Lincoln's approval of battle plans.
He would write things like, "By the time you read this, I will be successful or dead."

Every other general stood still, waiting for Lincoln to first cover their arse.
"Well, HE approved it, so failure is not MY fault."

One of the reasons large cops hire big consulting firms is executive career insurance.
The exec wants to make a risky decision, so hires a consulting team to document their action. If it doesn't work out, well, "We hired Bain &Co and the best minds agreed...."


Policy saying NO provides plausible deniability in the event of liability.

That's also why gov employees like to say no.
They want all the authority, but even more, to avoid ANY responsibility.

Had my friend had an accident,
"the pilot used their GA aircraft without corporate permission, contrary to company policy."
Big defense firm cannot be held liable (thereby removing pot of gold from trial lawyer)

--

Insurance and permission do not make liability 'go away,' merely move it around.

I could go into plausible deniability and my national security policy activities...
but then I'd have to shoot everyone on this message board....

Which would dramatically reduce market demand for Cessna 337s.
So I defer...