![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let's look at another popular Cessna Model, the 310R/T310R.
Total production: 1332 Total registered: 500 500/1332 = 37.5% Active Airframes The 310R is considered the penultimate 310, and even its 37.5% active is well below our P337H (51.6%), and not quite as high as our T337G (39%). Let's look at some older 310 models: C310K (1967) : 77/245 = 31.4% Active C310F (1961): 41/155 = 26.5% Active So the older 310s are significantly more active than our older models, yet our newer models are more active than the same-era 310s. Why do you suppose this is? What changed? Last edited by mshac : 03-01-23 at 02:07 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|