Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 04-05-10, 01:45 PM
N5ZX's Avatar
N5ZX N5ZX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 42
N5ZX is on a distinguished road
SkyMaster Wing Mods

Just a quick check to see how many of us have wing mods.

I have :
20gal Extended Tip-Tanks.
Rocket Winglets
Stall Fence
Flap-Gap seals

What do yall have?

Cole
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 04-05-10, 02:54 PM
Roger's Avatar
Roger Roger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FL-NY
Posts: 211
Roger is an unknown quantity at this point
None of the above.

MIcro VG's and standard (long range) 150 gals.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 04-05-10, 03:18 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,261
hharney is on a distinguished road
Flint Tip Tanks

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Cessn...zed/1673232/L/
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 04-05-10, 11:20 PM
stackj stackj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 311
stackj is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to stackj
Ouch!

It is unusual to see the mains fail and the nose gear hold up.
__________________
Jim Stack
Richmond, VA
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 04-05-10, 11:42 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,261
hharney is on a distinguished road
Dad's first Skymaster, 1967, on landing both mains failed. The down locks did not secure for some reason, don't remember the details.
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 04-06-10, 12:08 AM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 427
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
No mods here. Plane is as was in 1973 when it left the Cessna factory.

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 04-07-10, 12:02 AM
CO_Skymaster CO_Skymaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 153
CO_Skymaster is on a distinguished road
I have an OWL STOL kit.
The kit includes a leading edge and wingtips.

I'm currently investigating replacing it with a Horton STOL kit, but they are unsure if the Horton STOL will cover up the rivit holes created when the OWL STOL kit was installed. I'm still waiting for the answer.

Karl
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 04-10-10, 02:12 AM
CO_Skymaster CO_Skymaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 153
CO_Skymaster is on a distinguished road
Just an update incase anyone might have a similar situation. A Horton Kit will not fit on the same foot print as an OWL STOL kit. I would have to get a new leading edge or wing skin replaced and that's not worth it in my opinion.

Karl
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 04-10-10, 10:36 PM
sloutitt sloutitt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta,
Posts: 21
sloutitt is on a distinguished road
AE tanks and had AE tips

We have 20 gal tanks, (aviation Ent) and had winglets (AE) but after reading some of Coles posts and reviewing the SB we removed the winglets. Just did not want the stacked mods. Owen Bell supplied the stock style replacment tips and they fit perfect. We conducted the SB and found no bending, smoking rivits or distortions.
Sandy Loutitt
PS cole I did send you a Private message though I do not know if you recieved it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 04-23-10, 11:59 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,261
hharney is on a distinguished road
Horton Stol Wing Kit and Aviation Enterprises Lightning Winglets. Is that considered a stacked mod? Guess so. When installing the winglets I first tried to use a sheet metal screw between the original screws but did not like the results. I installed rivnuts on all fasteners and it just is much better mounting process.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4166.jpg
Views:	1520
Size:	258.8 KB
ID:	1107   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4167.jpg
Views:	1423
Size:	180.9 KB
ID:	1108   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4174.jpg
Views:	1560
Size:	198.7 KB
ID:	1109   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4180.jpg
Views:	1431
Size:	276.9 KB
ID:	1110   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4183.jpg
Views:	1583
Size:	262.2 KB
ID:	1111  

__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 04-24-10, 10:59 AM
tropical tropical is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 146
tropical is an unknown quantity at this point
In my opinion the "winglets" give the airplane a goofy look. And there is no aerodynamic advantage to have them.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 04-24-10, 11:45 PM
Alfonso Alfonso is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 32
Alfonso is an unknown quantity at this point
Original C336 And Fuel Questions

It has the original 46 gallons main fuel tanks and the 20 gallons auxiliary, for a total of 128 gallons, no reserve. I was planning to install the AE 20 gallons wing-tip tanks, but it is on hold until the NTSB clears those tanks from the C337 crash in NJ. I am considering instead internal aluminum tanks. Any suggestions?

FUEL QUESTION: Does any one has any experience in not getting fuel to the engines when low in fuel (7 gallons remaining on each main tank) and on level flight with flaps extended (low nose)? I understand some main tanks have front and rear tank-pipes to drain the fuel into the fuel selector, and others only have one pipe in the rear of the tank. Any suggestions or explanations are appreciated. Thanks.

Are there any further news from the NTSB or FAA on the C337 crash in NJ?

Alfonso.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 04-25-10, 09:14 AM
skymstr02's Avatar
skymstr02 skymstr02 is offline
Ace of the Atmosphere
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Madison, MS
Posts: 329
skymstr02 is an unknown quantity at this point
The main tanks all have fwd and aft outlets on all of the 337's. Both feed a small header tank in the lower boom, aft of the lift strut attach point. That is where the sump drain valve is located.
The aux tanks have a 18 gal capacity, not 20 gal, and all is usable.
If you are having problems with fuel feed, check your vents to assure that they are free and clear.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 04-25-10, 10:00 AM
Alfonso Alfonso is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 32
Alfonso is an unknown quantity at this point
Original C336 And Fuel Questions - conitinued...

After 3 hours of flight, I used the auxiliary tanks for 30 minutes, which I estimated it used 5 gallons per auxiliary and transferred about 7 gallons surplus fuel to each of the main tanks, leaving about 7 gallons on each auxiliary tank. Is there any procedure or requirement that states that when the auxiliary tanks are used, they have to be used all the way until they are emptied? I landed with a total of 26 gallons of fuel, but I do not like hearing the engine sputtering due to lack of fuel even though there was sufficient. The C336 generally flies with the nose always high about 2 to 3 degrees up, compared with the C337. So when the flaps are extended the wing flies flat relative to the earth, and the fuel in the main tanks spreads to the whole flat tank-wing rather than depositing in the rear of the tank when the nose is up, and where the fuel pick-up pipe is located to send the fuel to the fuel control valve. I remember reading about several years ago of a Skymaster, I do not remember if it was a C336 or a C337, that crashed short of the airport due to fuel starvation even though they apparently have plenty of fuel. Any comments, suggestions, articles, etc would be much appreciated. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Unread 04-25-10, 10:13 AM
Alfonso Alfonso is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 32
Alfonso is an unknown quantity at this point
Thumbs up Thank You Skymstr02

You are correct, the auxiliary tan has a capacity of 18 gallons, all usable. I was thinking in the 20 gallos tip tank. Thanks again. Any other ideas are welcome. Alfonso.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.