Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Unread 03-02-16, 04:57 PM
JamesC JamesC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 102
JamesC is on a distinguished road
Single engine service ceiling numbers are attached for a 1971 (non-turbo) Skymaster. Just to illustrate as an example, today it is +70 deg F at Sedona airport (4830 ‘ asl) and say an engine fails at max gross after take off. In a turbo model you will be climbing at ~ 240 fpm. According to the attached table, in the 1971 model you will have to descend. Obviously those who fly the non-turbos already know this. This also implies that say it is 80 deg F and humid, you will be lucky to maintain even 4000 feet at max power if an engine fails. Anecdotes re turbo vs non-turbo are entertaining, but the only anecdote that really matters is the one that you got yourself into when those Swiss cheese holes line up.
So like anything in flying you have to weigh the pros and cons (for turbos cons include the weight, the cost of maintenance/repair/overhaul, you have to be more careful with MP settings and treat them right, and it’s another thing that can fail in flight), and make your choice. Personally I chose turbo for all the reasons in the P337H tables attached earlier.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Non Turbo Data.jpg
Views:	899
Size:	101.0 KB
ID:	1646  

Last edited by JamesC : 03-03-16 at 06:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.