Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 02-07-19, 04:54 PM
tomcomet's Avatar
tomcomet tomcomet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 66
tomcomet is on a distinguished road
#1 Rear Still Hot

So the factory remans are in and I have 30+ hours on them. The breakin went smoothly, temps and oil consumption are down and everything is going great except for my old nemesis - high #1 rear cylinder head temps. Argh!

Up here in Canada I am flying around in 0 to -20C and even then I am breaking 400 degrees on #1 rear often and have to crack open the rear cowl flaps. Not normal and not great!

Here is the data from a very recent flight on the NEW ENGINES:https://www.savvyanalysis.com/flight...1-9ec59eaf0ef8

I did have this problem though a little less pronounced with the old, original engines as seen here - https://www.savvyanalysis.com/flight...0-e62f33991d3d

Obviously, the fact that this problem has followed me through both sets of engines points to the fact that the root of my problem is NOT the engines at all. In our never ending quest to fix the snag we have checked and redone all the baffling in the rear, rerouted the air intake hose that was slightly over #1R and gone so far as to use the high heat sealant to caulk and attach the metal baffles to the cylinder heads forcing all air past the cylinder fins (there were a few openings and holes etc.).

A friend of mine (Hi John) has the identical year 337G and he has difficulty getting his engines hot enough this time of year and is constantly bragging about taking off with his cowl flaps closed. This, of course drives me crazy as I am bewildered how a seemingly identical piece of hardware can create such different results. Obviously all airplanes are different and mine is French after all so it is even more so BUT I really want to get to the bottom of this puzzle.

Help!
__________________
TC
1977 Reims Built F337G
CYFD
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 02-07-19, 04:56 PM
tomcomet's Avatar
tomcomet tomcomet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 66
tomcomet is on a distinguished road
Follow Up Question...

On both front and rear engine #1 & #2 start out colder for both EGT & CHT. The only difference on the front engine the temps all converge and stay together for the most part once warmed up whereas in the rear #1 just stays much hotter. Not sure if them initially being colder means anything or if that is normal?
__________________
TC
1977 Reims Built F337G
CYFD
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 02-08-19, 02:03 PM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 427
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
Are we positive the CHT is really 400....?? Just a thought here but have you tried swapping the CHT probe from the suspect cylinder to another cylinder and vice versa? Are these the same probes in the exact same locations from the previous engines? It would be an interesting experiment nonetheless. If swapping probes leads to the same temps, then you know the 400 is valid.

I know another favorite of Mike Busch is to check the flow of the injector for that cylinder. Maybe that single injector is all jacked up. Just a thought....

Good Luck my friend!

I feel your pain.

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 02-08-19, 02:32 PM
tomcomet's Avatar
tomcomet tomcomet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 66
tomcomet is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by edasmus View Post
Are we positive the CHT is really 400....?? Just a thought here but have you tried swapping the CHT probe from the suspect cylinder to another cylinder and vice versa? Are these the same probes in the exact same locations from the previous engines? It would be an interesting experiment nonetheless. If swapping probes leads to the same temps, then you know the 400 is valid.

I know another favorite of Mike Busch is to check the flow of the injector for that cylinder. Maybe that single injector is all jacked up. Just a thought....

Ed
We have tried changing probes and the high heat issue does not move so it is not the probe. Yes, checking the injector is one of the next things on our list, however, these are all new GAMI injectors and that same cylinder had similar heat issues on the old injectors so not sure if that is going to help.
__________________
TC
1977 Reims Built F337G
CYFD
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 02-09-19, 09:46 AM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 427
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
OK, I was hoping you had the same old probes in the same locations on the new engines as in the old engines. If that were the case, I thought a likely probe issue but that would appear not the case based on your probe swapping attempts.

I agree it is probably unlikely your new GAMI injector has an issue but it would still be worth verifying. It's not impossible.

I'm guessing you have a relationship with Savvy Maintenance and Mike Busch.?.?

What do they say about that cylinder temp and what to attempt to do to solve the problem?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 02-09-19, 11:14 PM
DrDave DrDave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 115
DrDave is on a distinguished road
A picture of all of the baffling around the engine would certainly be helpful.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 02-11-19, 07:38 AM
tomcomet's Avatar
tomcomet tomcomet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 66
tomcomet is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDave View Post
A picture of all of the baffling around the engine would certainly be helpful.

Dave
I have a few but they are not great. Will take all the cowl covers off and do full pics soon.
__________________
TC
1977 Reims Built F337G
CYFD
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 02-11-19, 08:26 AM
kilr4d's Avatar
kilr4d kilr4d is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CNC3
Posts: 265
kilr4d is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcomet View Post
A friend of mine (Hi John) has the identical year 337G and he has difficulty getting his engines hot enough this time of year and is constantly bragging about taking off with his cowl flaps closed.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/fgwv.gif

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcomet View Post
Help!
Bunch of thoughts here; some of which you and I have discussed. I'll break it down into a few different posts.
__________________
_________
John K
1977 337G
CNC3
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 02-11-19, 08:58 AM
kilr4d's Avatar
kilr4d kilr4d is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CNC3
Posts: 265
kilr4d is on a distinguished road
Front engine

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcomet View Post
So the factory remans are in and I have 30+ hours on them. The breakin went smoothly, temps and oil consumption are down and everything is going great...
So I actually have more concerns about your front engine than your rear. The front engine on a Skymaster has better packaging (the cowl is tighter but better designed) from an airflow point of view but your front engine is running hotter than your rear.

Looking at the data I think there's one or two smoking guns and it's the fuel flows and possibly timing. I've attached two flights from this week; one yours and one mine so we have similar ambient temps, etc. The book calls for 18.1GPH takeoff fuel flows and the conventional wisdom has been to pad that a bit. Comparing the two, your front engine ranges from 17.6GPH to 17.8GPH at takeoff power and my front engine seems to stay at 18.3GPH. So the front needs more fuel.

The other thing to look at is ignition timing and the rate with which your cylinder temps rise. Your CHT's climb FAST and this can be an indication of timing that's advanced. As a matter of fact, I'm going to be checking my timing for the opposite reason; I think mine might be a degree or two retarded.

Action items:
  1. Check fuel flows as per TCM SID using calibrated gauges.
  2. Check timing using a digital angle finder, not just the analog dial with buzz box.
  3. Let's park ours sided by side, decowl and compare baffle seals.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	cgrbr takeoff front.jpg
Views:	1412
Size:	77.2 KB
ID:	1917   Click image for larger version

Name:	gtav takeoff front.jpg
Views:	1429
Size:	73.6 KB
ID:	1918  
__________________
_________
John K
1977 337G
CNC3

Last edited by kilr4d : 02-11-19 at 07:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 02-11-19, 09:15 AM
kilr4d's Avatar
kilr4d kilr4d is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CNC3
Posts: 265
kilr4d is on a distinguished road
Rear engine

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcomet View Post
Up here in Canada I am flying around in 0 to -20C and even then I am breaking 400 degrees on #1 rear often and have to crack open the rear cowl flaps. Not normal and not great!
Your rear engine is a completely different story and imho it isn't an airflow issue.

The rear engine (except for cyl#1) is way happier than the front....higher fuel flow, gentler CHT rise, consistently cooler temps, etc. From what I see the #1 cylinder is an isolated issue.

Action items:
  1. Check fuel flows as per TCM SID using calibrated gauges.
  2. Check timing using a digital angle finder, not the old buzz box.
  3. Talk to GAMI about the #1 cylinder...confirm correct injector shipped and installed in correct cylinder.
  4. Fly and record an LOP mag test. A bad plug or wire can cause high CHT's.
  5. Clean injector and confirm flow from fuel injector block.
  6. Check for vacuum leak in intake manifold to cylinder.
  7. I hate to say it but also borescope the #1 cylinder just to make sure cylinder walls and valves look ok.
  8. Let's park ours sided by side, decowl and compare baffle seals.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	cgrbr takeoff rear.jpg
Views:	1426
Size:	64.7 KB
ID:	1919  
__________________
_________
John K
1977 337G
CNC3

Last edited by kilr4d : 02-11-19 at 09:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 02-11-19, 09:32 AM
kilr4d's Avatar
kilr4d kilr4d is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CNC3
Posts: 265
kilr4d is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcomet View Post
Obviously, the fact that this problem has followed me through both sets of engines points to the fact that the root of my problem is NOT the engines at all.
Yeah, about that....it's time to try a different mechanic. Seriously. Sometimes all the problem needs is a different set of eyes.

I know it's a pain in the butt to get work done away from your home 'drome but there's a couple other guys around that should take a look at your plane. This needs a methodical process of elimination starting with the basics...fuel and spark.
__________________
_________
John K
1977 337G
CNC3
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 02-11-19, 11:26 AM
JAG JAG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 260
JAG is on a distinguished road
Good Advice

I am with John - if you have eliminated the easy stuff (Indication issue), you need to look at Fuel, spark and timing.

Some great articles to read were written a few years ago by John Deakin on Avweb, and you can still find them:

https://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/182084-1.html
https://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/182179-1.html

These are just 2 links to get you started - but essential reading to bring focus to the relationship that fuel air mixture and spark have to do with you CHT.

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 02-11-19, 12:39 PM
kilr4d's Avatar
kilr4d kilr4d is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CNC3
Posts: 265
kilr4d is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by edasmus View Post
Are we positive the CHT is really 400....?? Just a thought here but have you tried swapping the CHT probe from the suspect cylinder to another cylinder and vice versa? Are these the same probes in the exact same locations from the previous engines?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcomet View Post
We have tried changing probes and the high heat issue does not move so it is not the probe. Yes, checking the injector is one of the next things on our list, however, these are all new GAMI injectors and that same cylinder had similar heat issues on the old injectors so not sure if that is going to help.
Going forward with this thought, has anyone tested the continuity of the wire from the rear engine to the panel?

Did they re-use the harness from the old GEM or lay in a new harness?
__________________
_________
John K
1977 337G
CNC3
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 02-11-19, 01:13 PM
kilr4d's Avatar
kilr4d kilr4d is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CNC3
Posts: 265
kilr4d is on a distinguished road
Also, I neglected to mention rigging in my previous posts. Crucially important that pushing the mixture lever forward pushes the mixture control on the pump to the forward stop.
__________________
_________
John K
1977 337G
CNC3
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Unread 02-12-19, 08:49 PM
DrDave DrDave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 115
DrDave is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcomet View Post
I have a few but they are not great. Will take all the cowl covers off and do full pics soon.
It is quite helpful to have a bright drop light in the lower plenum area and look for light leaks around the baffling and all of the poorly sealed areas around the motor. Look closely to the area across the top cowling where it is scalloped. I'm going to devise a fix for that. I'll send pics when I do.

Dave
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.