Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 08-03-10, 10:00 PM
Ernie Martin's Avatar
Ernie Martin Ernie Martin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 989
Ernie Martin is an unknown quantity at this point
100LL Fuel Availability

Good information in the May and July issues of AOPA Pilot Magazine on 100LL fuel, which leads me to this question: does anyone know the compression ratio on our engines?

To get your attention, one of those issues has a statement I had never seen before, saying that 100LL will "certainly" not be available 1n 10 years. I had seen "probably" but not "certainly".

The issues report on considerable work being done to come up wih a solution, including the possibility of alternative fuels.

What most intrigued me was that most aircraft piston engones (~ 70%) can operate satisfactorily on avfuel without lead -- essentially 100LL but without the lead additive. These engines are those with compression ratios of 7.5 to 1 and below, where the lower octane (much less than 100) would be adequate. Only higher performance engines -- including turbos -- need the higher octane.

So the fix is easy for 70% of the engines (just remove the lead) but much tougher for the remaining 30% with higher compression (here, an alternative high-octane fuel and modified ignition systems with variable timing based on sensor data are some of the solutions being studied).

I'm starting this thread, not just with the compression ratio inquiry, but also as a catalyst for more discussions and views on the subject.

Ernie
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 08-03-10, 11:04 PM
CO_Skymaster CO_Skymaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 153
CO_Skymaster is on a distinguished road
I've gotten a headache from following this issue. I looked up the compression ratio for our engines (TCM IO-360) on the internet. It's 8.5:1, making it one of the engines that will need modification. I've seen suggestions from FADEC, down to adjusting the timing, to placing some type of insert between the core and cylinder (increasing the volume, and reducing compression ratio). I've decided that whatever happens, I will adjust to the new procedures and specs for running my engine. I know there will be changes, but I don't believe all the doom and gloom surrounding the issue.

Karl
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 08-04-10, 01:41 AM
stratobee stratobee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles and London
Posts: 27
stratobee is on a distinguished road
That could be a solution. A de-rating of the engine and less useful payload.

The new 250hp RR300 turbine in the Robinson R66 is an interesting development and could potentially be a good fit for a turbine conversion for those who have too much money.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 08-06-10, 10:08 PM
wybenga wybenga is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: T31
Posts: 21
wybenga is an unknown quantity at this point
Ul 94

Hi Ernie

Continental "Mobile Al" has made a statement that the TSIO-360 will be approved for UL 94, which is 100LL without the lead. Does not look like a severe problem for our airplanes

Jack
reims P337 N1049D
Malibu N26PG
________
MEDICAL CANNABIS SEEDS

Last edited by wybenga : 09-01-11 at 05:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 08-07-10, 12:16 AM
Ernie Martin's Avatar
Ernie Martin Ernie Martin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 989
Ernie Martin is an unknown quantity at this point
Great news, although it seems to run counter to what I've been reading, if the compression ratio is indeed 8.5:1.

Ernie
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 08-07-10, 07:37 PM
CO_Skymaster CO_Skymaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 153
CO_Skymaster is on a distinguished road
If that's true, it would be great news. I haven't heard anything. TCM seems to be very closed mouth about any of their projects. They tend to come out and say it exists, then you never hear anything about it again.

Karl
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.