Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 07-31-20, 06:15 AM
mikezen mikezen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 24
mikezen is on a distinguished road
Riley Super Skyrocket !

Hi,
I'm Michel Heintz, french new member of this forum (living in France).
For a long time ago, I have ever been very fond of Skymasters and, in particular, of Riley Super Skyrocket conversion.
Now, I'm about to purchase such a plane (purchase agreement signed, prebuy inspection in progress), though some people advise not to do so !
Are there any Super Skyrocket owners on this forum ?
If yes, is it really a bad idea ? Are they effectively money-pits, when they are flown enough frequently and well maintained ?
What about their reliabiliy ? Is it really so bad ?
Does rear engine always overheat or is it a matter of engine management ?
I know their fuel consumption is higher and payload lower than normal Skymasters, but in french we say "when you love, you don't count !"
One last question : the plane I look at isn't equipped with de-icing boots, is it possible to add them, though the presence of required Horton STOL kit (STC SA937CE) ?
Thanks for your answers !
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 07-31-20, 11:29 AM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,253
hharney is on a distinguished road
Yes, deice boots can be added to the Horton STOL wing cuff. The real question would be, is the aircraft already "PLUMBED" for boots? If it was plumbed from the factory, has all the vacuum pressure lines already installed but never had boots or the boots were removed, then it would be cost effective to add the boots. But if the aircraft is NOT plumbed, in my opinion it's not going to be cost effective to retrofit the application.

Remember, NONE of the Skymasters ever built were certified for icing conditions
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 07-31-20, 11:42 AM
mikezen mikezen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 24
mikezen is on a distinguished road
Thank you Herb
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 08-01-20, 11:07 AM
rrolland rrolland is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 93
rrolland is on a distinguished road
Michel:

I own a standard Riley Rocket which is the same aircraft as the Super Rocket with the exception of the engines. The systems are the same, the complexity the same.

If your aircraft is flown regularly and maintained appropriately, it will be reliable. And an incredible performer with the extra power. Single Engine rate of climb should be in excess of 500PFM.

The same drawbacks will exist: it is tight under both cowlings and access often requires removing other components and...patience.

You will need to find a mechanic who does not mind the challenge.

Payload will be in exchange of range. This is true of the Rocket as well but more so for the Super Rocket. Some of the Super Rockets have limited payload left at full fuel. So the payload comes off the fuel load.

It all depends on your mission.

Enjoy the Super Rocket!

Richard
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 08-01-20, 11:47 AM
mikezen mikezen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 24
mikezen is on a distinguished road
Thank you for this positive testimony !
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 08-01-20, 12:00 PM
Red Air Rambo's Avatar
Red Air Rambo Red Air Rambo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Posts: 137
Red Air Rambo is on a distinguished road
Hi Michel, a friend had one and he loved it...you will too! His ran a little hot on the rear and He added the cooling kit from Owen Bell which consists of about 3 more vents and an added scoop...but every plane is different so fly it first...if it made it this long without anybody adding it then its probably good. +1 one on everything Richard and Herb said. it's a plane that falls into the hot rod rule of "There's no replacement for displacement" lol.

Have fun,
Brent
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 08-01-20, 12:26 PM
mikezen mikezen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 24
mikezen is on a distinguished road
Smile

Thanks Brent !
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 08-04-20, 11:53 AM
JimC's Avatar
JimC JimC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 301
JimC is on a distinguished road
They're the same engines as the Cessna 340, so you can expect maintenance costs to be similar.

340s can cost upwards of $350,000 so owners aren't as surprised when they have a $25,000 annual.

337s often cost less than $100,000 so owners can be more surprised when an annual costs $25,000. (If a Rocket costs less than $100,000 it needs a lot of work!)

I've owned both a 340 and a 337. They each have their own uses. But don't expect one to cost less than the other.

Last edited by JimC : 08-04-20 at 05:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 08-04-20, 03:31 PM
mikezen mikezen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 24
mikezen is on a distinguished road
Thank you Jim !
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 02-18-21, 06:40 PM
mshac's Avatar
mshac mshac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: North Texas
Posts: 746
mshac is on a distinguished road
Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC, with full fuel, a Super Skyrocket has a payload of less than 200 lbs. There was supposedly an STC to increase grow weight to 5400 lbs, not sure if it ever happened: http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?d...4-6988ade12e5c
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 02-19-21, 08:12 AM
mikezen mikezen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 24
mikezen is on a distinguished road
As an answer to Nate's (6498w) question :

"Hi Michel,
Did you end up buying the Super Skyrocket? I'm looking at one now and having the same thoughts you had when you started this post. I'm wondering if you have any insight you can offer after hopefully having a successful purchase!
Thank you,
Nate"

I finally did not buy the Riley Super Skyrocket I was looking at : it had lost it's Gross Weight increase to 5120 lbs.
With a 4700 lbs Gross Weight, it just isn't worth it : with 800 lbs useful load, you never can have full tanks (148 USG) : the aircraft becomes a Formula 1 !
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.