Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 02-04-10, 11:21 PM
scottygofast scottygofast is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 10
scottygofast is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to scottygofast
Hello to all, Im very proud to join your group!

Hello to all on here~


I recently came across an oppertunity i just couldn't pass up. I purchased N358, Which i believe many of you may be familiar with from a few years back. I got a rather amazing deal on the airplane, ferried it back from FLL here to Clearwater Airpark near Tampa. After a very through Annual, (bout 12Ks worth), Im very glad to say she is back airworthy and is running like a champ. She had been setting for a bit but after a fresh coat of wax, almost looks like it just came off the line.

I must thank Don Nieser for the Parts support! He had just about everything I needed and quite alot of it too. Great experience working with him. The Local shop on the field here at CLW started trying to find parts and they were scared to tell me what they were finding until I hooked them up with Don. He definately saved the day amidst a blizzard in OK. I would have brought the pane up to Don for the annual, but having it done 5 minutes from my house was just too appealing, and even though they hadnt ever worked on a skymaster, they seem to have done a great job, at a very fair price. worked alot of deals to try to keep the cost of this annual down, seeing as how all the lord mounts, a fuel pump, a mag, both cowl flap motors (which they were able to fix in house for a couple hours labor thankfully), and exhaust, as just part of the laundry list of squaks.

I have my commercial multi inst. and rotor, and have a bunch of time in 310s and twin otters, but before purchase i only had a couple hours in a skymaster, so I have some getting used to to do on my new plane, couple questions, is everyone's Elevator so heavy? I love how this plane is flying, just lands a bit different than most everything else Ive flown.. a bit porposiey if that is even a word. How much are most of you using the electric trim on approach? Ive been reading many of the recent posts and must say you all are very informative and im trying to get through everything that I come up with on the search, but im sure there will be more to come~

First test flight after the annual went well, everything but a fuel gague worked great, just getting used to power settings. actually saw 179 kts at 1000' on my way home from some touch and goes, and I gotta say, you guys know where its at. Im looking forward to meeting everyone at Sun & Fun, as Im planning on attending, Might even make it up to daytona for drinks with everyone. Ill get a couple pics up when I get them re sized... thanks!
__________________
Blue Skies~

Scotty Burns

www.scottyburns.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 02-04-10, 11:42 PM
CO_Skymaster CO_Skymaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 152
CO_Skymaster is on a distinguished road
Scotty,

Welcome to the forum. This is a great place to find all types of information concerning your 337. It's been a great help to me concerning serval issues I've had to deal with.

Hope you enjoy it,

Karl
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 02-05-10, 12:52 PM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 420
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
Hi Scotty,

I'm not quite sure what you mean by the elevator being "heavy." I'm assuming you mean quite heavy in pitch especially on landing. What I can offer you is something to check. My 73 C337G model is not heavy at all in pitch. It is very easy to land. On my particular model (and I do not know if it is identical on other models, please verify because these airplanes have many differences between models), the trim has limits that change with flap settings. As more flaps are selected, more aft trim becomes available. After landing as you select flaps up, you can watch the trim wheel roll itself forward (nose down) to the highest level of aft trim with the flaps up. There is mechanical linkage that accomplishes all this and must be rigged correctly. When I purchased my airplane many years ago, it was all messed up. All this info would be in the service manual.

As for your fuel gauges, see my posts and many others on the signal conditioner aka fuel control monitor. These fuel gauges have caused many headaches to owners so good luck. Again, my airplane is a 73 C337G and I do not know if the system will be the same in your model. The good news is that after replacing the signal conditioner with an overhauled unit from Aeromach Labs $700, the gauges have been working well.

My final thought and I apologize if I sound as if I am preaching, please take the time to get to know your Skymaster. Read and understand every word of your operator manual. I have read every accident report on the Skymaster and it is so sad to see literally 75% of the events being caused by simple improper handling of the aircraft under normal circumstances, especially the fuel system.

Ok, I'm done now. Congrats on your new to you Skymaster and enjoy the airplane. I love mine and it truly is a wonderful airplane to fly.

Good Luck,

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 02-06-10, 05:07 PM
scottygofast scottygofast is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 10
scottygofast is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to scottygofast
Smile

Ed & Karl, thanks for the welcome~

Thanks for the info on the trim, after looking at the POH, I went to the airport today, and found that with the master on, and flaps retracted, the maximum trim nose up is at the bottom of the white take off mark on the trim wheel. I then dropped the flaps incrementally, and found that the trim wheel, even at full flaps down, would not trim any further nose up than the spot it was at with flaps fully retracted. Would that mean that there is a circuit or something not closing when the flaps are operated, or would this be more of a cable rigging issue? I only ask, knowing from your response that its a mechanical linkage, because it didnt change anything at all with the flaps operating. Also, before I took it up on the maint. flight friday, I noticed while taxiing that the elevator was catching, or had a tight spot halfway or so through its travel, I had the mechs check it before we went, and they had found that the chain that drives the nav-o-matic had a kink in it, so they tightened the chain and the problem was resolved.

How much nose up trim, in relation to the take off white marking on the trim wheel assby, would you say you have in the elevator while on a normal approach to landing? obviously, if theres 16deg. of travel im not getting out of the trim tab, would be the reason the airplane feels so "heavy" on landing, wouldnt you agree?

This is a very cool and unique aircraft, that im looking forward to putting a lot of time on, and I totally agree with you Ed. Im studyin~

Thanks again for your time~
__________________
Blue Skies~

Scotty Burns

www.scottyburns.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 02-06-10, 06:18 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,254
hharney is on a distinguished road
For take-off I use the bottom of the white mark (up trim) with the published 1/3 flaps. I have the Horton Stol wing and normally rotate at 75 - 80 indicated although the aircraft is already asking to leap off the ground.

For landing I use 1/3 flaps on downwind (160 MPH) and then slow it to 140 MPH for the gear.
On base I use 2/3 flaps and final full flaps. While base to final I will use 110 - 120 MPH and full up trim. When I add full flaps on final then the trim system allows more up direction as desired. On final I use 100 - 105 and normally end up full up trim with full flaps. Once the runway is made then let it bleed to 75 or 80 for touchdown. I find if you land with too much speed you may experience some hard landings or maybe the "porpoising" you might be experiencing. Keep in mind with my numbers I have the Stol wing.

Yes the elevator is a little heavy but use the trim to assist and you will find that your landings will be greasers. The Skymaster is a very easy airplane to land.
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 02-07-10, 09:16 PM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 420
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
Hi Scotty,

I cannot answer your question precisely about where the exact trim location is for landing. I am fairly sure it is aft of the range marked on the trim panel next to the trim wheel. The no flap range is the range marked on the plastic panel next to the trim wheel and then the trim pointer actually moves aft of the entire range marking on the plastic after I have selected full flaps for landing and select more aft trim to relieve the heavy feel of the elevator. After landing and selecting flaps up, the trim wheel will automatically roll itself forward to the aft end of the range marked on the plastic panel which is the full aft location available with the flaps up. As I mentioned, on my airplane, this is all accomplished with mechanical linkage. There is no electrical involved here. The next time I fly, I will pay close attention to the pointer for various stages of flight and report what I find. We are to get 6-10 inches of snow tomorrow so it may be a week or two before I get my hanger dug out enough to fly.

As Herb mentioned, these aircraft are very easy to land. My experience has been quite easy to land on the mains and hold the nose off with easy back pressure on the control wheel. It is not heavy in pitch at all if properly configured for landing. I'm not sure if all models of the 337 have this trim configuration. Have your shop check the service manual for your model. My guess is something is not rigged correctly in your airplane. I suspect you are working too hard to land your plane. I have never heard anyone describe it the way you do.

I do not know if you have any time in a Cherokee6, but that was a nose heavy airplane. I would actually roll enough aft trim on short final in that airplane to cause me to have to push slightly on the control wheel to hold the proper attitude. Then for the flare, the required back pressure was at a more manageable level. In my Skymaster however, this has never been the case. There has always been enough trim available and much better balanced control forces in all configurations to not have to work even remotely hard. I'm thinking you should have the control rigging checked. Good luck and I will report back with more precise trim positions when I can.

Take care,

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 02-07-10, 09:23 PM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 420
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
One other thing Scotty....with the flaps full down and the trim at the aft position on your trim pointer range, it actually takes more force to manually roll the trim aft for the additional amount available when the flaps are down on my airplane. Obviously, do not force anything, but the force to manually roll the trim the additional amount available aft with the flaps fully extended is definitely higher then rolling the trim through the normal range when the flaps are up. There is more resistance on the trim wheel is what I am trying to say. The level of resistance is high enough that the first time I attempted it after my IA re-rigged the trim system he had to demonstrate for me. I thought I had wheeled in full aft trim with the flaps down but in fact I had not. I hope this makes sense.

Last edited by edasmus : 02-08-10 at 03:29 PM. Reason: clarification...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 02-08-10, 05:08 PM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 420
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
Hey Scotty....

I checked my POH today and from Section 2 - Systems, page 2-14, the following is exactly as quoted in the POH.



WING FLAP-ELEVATOR TAB INTERCONNECT SYSTEM

"The wing flap system is mechanically interconnected with the elevator trim tab system to automatically eliminate excessive nose-up trim while the wing flaps are being retracted.

With the flaps retracted, the trim control wheel can be rotated in one direction until the trim position indicator reaches the NOSE DN position, or in the opposite direction until it reaches the lower half of the TAKE-OFF range marking for nose-up trim. As the flaps are extended, additional nose-up trim beyond the TAKE-OFF range can be utilized. Maximum nose-up trim is available when the flaps are fully extended. As the flaps are retracted, the interconnect will automatically rotate the trim back to the TAKE-OFF range."



Check your POH and see if you can find any reference to this system. What year and model do you have?

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 02-15-10, 04:55 PM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 420
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
Scotty,

I managed to do some flying over the weekend as well as today and here are my observations with the elevator trim. I place it in the center or maybe just a touch aft of center of the "TAKE-OFF" range marked on the pointer scale. This makes for a nice easy rotation as the airplane is accelerating through 85-90MPH with flaps at 1/3 extended position. After rotation a slight forward trim is required to hold 110-120MPH on initial climb. Once the airplane is cleaned up some additional forward trim is required to cruise climb between 140-150MPH. All speeds are indicated airspeeds.

During landing, after adding full flaps, the trim pointer is well aft of the "TAKE-OFF" range. Probably a third to half an inch aft of the "TAKE-OFF" range as marked. This is into the additional trim that becomes available with the addition of full flaps. This is at a final approach speed of 90MPH with full flaps making for an easy flare into a smooth touch down with the nose wheel clear of the runway. I can continue to easily hold the nose off for several seconds after main wheel touchdown until the speed bleeds off at which time the nose will gently fall to the runway.

Hopes this helps.

Take-care, Ed
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 02-15-10, 05:37 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,254
hharney is on a distinguished road
If you remove the rich Corinthian plastic that Cessna used around the trim pointer you will see that the pointer can be moved and adjusted very easily. You may want to roll the trim to center (check the tab on the elevator) and be sure it is calibrated to about the top of the take-off mark.
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 02-15-10, 07:13 PM
edasmus edasmus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ARR - Aurora, IL - USA
Posts: 420
edasmus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to edasmus
Thanks for the info Herb. Do you think my trim indicator is incorrectly calibrated? It seems that it would be indicating accurately. It points in the center of the take-off range during take-off with maybe just a hint aft of that if no one is in the back seats. The pointer is only well aft of the take-off range during landing which is logical to me because I rolled in substantial nose up trim for the landing. Is yours different?

Thanks Ed
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 02-15-10, 07:14 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,254
hharney is on a distinguished road
Sounds correct to me. If it's in the T/O area with those results I would say that it is close enough.
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 02-15-10, 08:51 PM
Roger's Avatar
Roger Roger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FL-NY
Posts: 211
Roger is an unknown quantity at this point
Might I just say (and please others correct me) but isn't 90mph on final with full flaps a bit fast for that much flap. I could see it over the numbers, but I've never liked full flaps and a lot of power to "force the plane" down final. It seems so much smoother to be at 1/2 - 2/3rd flaps at 90, and then just shy of the numbers hit the rest of the flap to bleed it to stall speed on touchdown. Thoughts ?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 02-15-10, 09:51 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,254
hharney is on a distinguished road
I think Ed is referring to the approach and ready to land. Not over the fence yet. I use about the same, full flaps at 1/4 mile final and 100 MPH IAS (blue line) and then let start to bleed off. I have full aft trim at this point and once I cross the fence at 85-90 MPH IAS just pull the throttle off and let it sink to the flair. Greases every time. If it is a short field then I will establish an airspeed of 80-85 MPH IAS, with power, full flaps, full aft trim and fly the airplane to the fence then bleed it off. Normally the horn is squawking before I reach the fence but with the stol wing the horn sound pre-maturely.

The POH attached calls for the 90 - 100 like Ed quotes too.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Snapshot 2010-02-15 21-45-04.jpg
Views:	890
Size:	133.6 KB
ID:	1052  
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Unread 02-15-10, 10:04 PM
Roger's Avatar
Roger Roger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FL-NY
Posts: 211
Roger is an unknown quantity at this point
I guess it depends on how you read it, and what you are comfortable with. I learned out of a grass strip years ago, with an instructor who always talked about gliding to the runway in case of engine failure. This being virtually impossible if you are powering your way down the hill with a lot of flaps. I just looked in my book and for normal landing it say: Airspeed - 80-90 KIAS (flaps UP)

2/3 to full below 110 KIAS
Airspeed 75-85 KIAS (flaps down)
Trim - Adjust
touchdown - Main first.

I always took that to mean the stabilized short approach (with full flaps) is 80 KIAS+/-. Of course it may be splitting hairs as 80 KIAS is like 90 MIAS, but it is still a might slower than Blue Line with full flaps.

I guess it is just what you get comfortable with, but regardless I try to stay away from full flaps until I am within 1/4 mile.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.