Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 08-27-13, 11:04 AM
JmG2102 JmG2102 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: El Paso, TX.
Posts: 3
JmG2102 is on a distinguished road
Looking for your input

Hi folks,
I would like to get some feedback from all of the 336/337 pilots/owners. I am on the road to getting my PPL and am seriously interested in getting a 337 as my aircraft. I fully believe in the 337 attributes (push pull twin engine configuration) are definite assets. I realize that moving into a twin as a 1st aircraft may be a rather large 1st step but all in all I feel that the 337 is the way to go. One of the reasons I have selected the 337 is that I live in Colorado and the altitude as well as mountain flying will be some of the issues that I will encounter and the 337 is the aircraft that will handle this.Can I respectfully ask you your own opinions on this matter?
Respectfully Submitted,
Jon G
Elbert,CO.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 08-27-13, 12:30 PM
Apelsin Elise Apelsin Elise is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5
Apelsin Elise is on a distinguished road
Go for it.

I fly 1979 P337H out of KBJC. It is my first aircraft, I bought it six months after my PPL. No regrets.

Pressurized Skymasters are great for flying in the mountains. It is a very safe and forgiving aircraft. It flies nice on one engine. It can climb high and go fast (195 KTAS, 26 gph). It can stay low and go slow (135 KTAS, 15 gph). You get lots of options on how to fly it.

You will love handling and high density altitude performance. Leadville, Granby, Telluride and Glenwood Springs will be easy for you even on a hot July afternoon. Your passengers will enjoy looking at the mountain scenery instead of studying rivets on the wing and engine nacelles up close. Pressurization will spoil you rotten in Colorado.

I cannot think of a better aircraft for Colorado mountain flying.

Alex

Last edited by Apelsin Elise : 08-27-13 at 12:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 08-27-13, 11:15 PM
Frank Benvin's Avatar
Frank Benvin Frank Benvin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: CYCD
Posts: 334
Frank Benvin is an unknown quantity at this point
Go for it my dad at 55 did half of his training on a single and the balance on a C337b He did his ride for his private licence in the C337b Now he is 83 and still flying his C337b

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 08-28-13, 03:03 PM
bjherron bjherron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 30
bjherron is on a distinguished road
I bought my P337 before I finished my private certificate, and started flying it with about 75 hours. In the following two years I put about 150-200 hours of flying time on it.

You just have to be careful that you don't get into situations (i.e. weather) that exceeds your experience. Also, plan on a LOT of dual time before you start soloing in the 337. I had about 25 hours of dual before I started taking solo cross country trips.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 08-29-13, 03:13 PM
Ernie Martin's Avatar
Ernie Martin Ernie Martin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 989
Ernie Martin is an unknown quantity at this point
My initial reaction was to disagree about the number of dual hours. You see, after you've flown a 337 for a while, it's so easy, the aircraft so forgiving, that I thought 5 or 10 hours of dual, after your single private, would suffice. So I started writing a response along these lines, then decided to go find my 15-year-old logbook where the 337 dual was recorded and, surprise, I had about 30 hours. Oh, that's after my single private and a thousand hours of simulator time, most of it on multi-engine.

Anyhow, long response to say, yes, you'll need a LOT of dual time to fly a 337 safely.

Ernie
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 08-29-13, 10:29 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,253
hharney is on a distinguished road
There was a C model for sale over in Paonia at the airport. I heard that it was a pretty nice Skymaster for a reasonable price. Not sure if that is in your area or not.

Once you get the bug you won't be satisfied till you taste the real thing .........
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 09-12-13, 12:55 PM
JamesC JamesC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 102
JamesC is on a distinguished road
Congratulations on not going the SR22 route. Obviously will in part depend on your skill level - I was not ready right after PPL. Bought my first Skymaster at 300 hours. Just don't get seduced by a marginal mission just because you have 2 engines (eg. as you know plenty of dead Cirrus pilots likely over-relied on the fact that they have a chute in their decision making process). Also be very careful about which 337 you buy - plenty of problem aircraft out there for sale with the oil all cleaned off.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 09-20-13, 06:38 PM
sns3guppy sns3guppy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: none
Posts: 38
sns3guppy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
You will love handling and high density altitude performance. Leadville, Granby, Telluride and Glenwood Springs will be easy for you even on a hot July afternoon.
Flying to those locations is easy when all is working well.

You won't like them if you experience an engine-out, and that should always be your first consideration when flight planning. We don't plan for everything to work; we plan for failures, and then know we're safe when we can still work the emergencies and have enough margin of performance to get by.

Sometimes people mistake good two-engine performance for a pass to go places they ought not, conveniently forgetting what happens when power is lost. Same for the single engine crowd that forgets basic airmanship is always keeping a landing site within gliding distance.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 09-23-13, 03:22 PM
Apelsin Elise Apelsin Elise is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5
Apelsin Elise is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sns3guppy View Post
Flying to those locations is easy when all is working well.

You won't like them if you experience an engine-out, and that should always be your first consideration when flight planning. We don't plan for everything to work; we plan for failures, and then know we're safe when we can still work the emergencies and have enough margin of performance to get by.

Sometimes people mistake good two-engine performance for a pass to go places they ought not, conveniently forgetting what happens when power is lost. Same for the single engine crowd that forgets basic airmanship is always keeping a landing site within gliding distance.
Of course. You are absolutely right.

Training and planning should never be discounted, especially when flying over extremely hostile terrain: Fly early in the morning. Always check density altitude. Check winds. Fly light. Always (try to) have an out. Take mountain flying course. Read books on mountain flying. Stay proficient. Don't get into the weather. Be prepared.

However, everything happens in a context. Short of turbines, what other twin would you prefer to be in while having an engine failure on takeoff from a high DA mountain airport?

Engine failure after takeoff from Glenwood Springs spells trouble for any piston twin. Most likely it will end in a crash. And crash options are not pretty in Glenwood Springs. My point is that turbo Skymaster or P-Skymaster will do better than most of the other piston twins there.

OP asked about Skymaster performance in the context of flying in Colorado. While I have never experienced complete engine failure in my Skymaster (yet), I have had partial power loss and other system failures over the mountains. It was not fun, but my P337 made it manageable. And, so far, safe.

Would you suggest another twin better suited for the OP mission? If yes, which one and why?

Speaking about single engine piston airplanes always keeping a landing site within gliding distance... this is (realistically) not an option in Colorado. You either take your chances while keeping your time over "no landing options" terrain to a minimum... or you stay home.

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 09-23-13, 04:44 PM
Cessna 337 Cessna 337 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 4
Cessna 337 is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up First Plane

Your plan to aquire a 337 as your first airplane is solid. I purchased my 337D prior to completing my PPL, however, I did finish on the single (tomahawk) as the 337D was in for the annual for two months. I started my dual 337 flying after a few solo hrs in the single and took my multi ride after 30 hrs of dual. It is now 6 months since my CLT ride and I have 90 hrs Multi.
I remember how "busy" I was for those first 5-10 hrs in the 337 and thought I would never get ahead of the plane. Then, it all clicked. I love the Skymaster and I'm very happy I chose it as my first aircraft.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 09-23-13, 08:59 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,253
hharney is on a distinguished road
If possible achieve your Multi engine rating in a standard, side by side, twin. Then you are all set with a Multi engine rating that is not limited to CLT. Trust me, I didn't do it that way and really wished I had. I now have the Multi with no limitation but should have just done so from the beginning. Just my own thoughts. ...... FWIW
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 09-24-13, 01:57 PM
Jim Nelson's Avatar
Jim Nelson Jim Nelson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Egg Harbor, WI
Posts: 3
Jim Nelson is on a distinguished road
I think the centerline thrust limitation has been removed. I can't find any mention of the CLT limitation in the current FAR Part 61 and nothing about it in the multiengine training stuff. I seem to remember it was removed a couple of years ago, but I'm just not sure. Does anyone know one way or another?

Thanks!
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 09-24-13, 06:53 PM
Cessna 337 Cessna 337 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 4
Cessna 337 is on a distinguished road
Clt

Recieved my Multi in March 2013. Under restrictions it says "Center Line Thrust Only". No VMC training in the 337.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 09-24-13, 07:19 PM
Jim Nelson's Avatar
Jim Nelson Jim Nelson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Egg Harbor, WI
Posts: 3
Jim Nelson is on a distinguished road
That's pretty definitive!

Thanks!
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Unread 09-25-13, 10:43 AM
WebMaster's Avatar
WebMaster WebMaster is offline
Web Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,524
WebMaster is on a distinguished road
Multi-Training

There are several schools around the country that do the 5 day Multi engine training. I did that, it's intense, but they are set up with multiple airplanes, all the same, and there is no down time for instructors or airplanes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.