Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 05-18-09, 09:47 PM
CO_Skymaster CO_Skymaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 152
CO_Skymaster is on a distinguished road
Resistance to Turbulence

I took a friend on a flight from Colorado Springs to Santa Fe yesterday. The trip was pretty smooth on the way down, but on the way back we experienced some light turbulence. It didn't bother me, but by friend was starting to become nauseous. I started me thinking about the vortex generators and a claim I saw that the aircraft becomes more stable in turbulent air. For those who have the vortex generators, STOL kits, and winglets have you found that your airplane is more turbulent resistant with them vs. without them?

Karl
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 05-19-09, 06:58 AM
billsheila billsheila is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 82
billsheila is an unknown quantity at this point
I have had two airplanes with VG's (a Maule and now my 337) and one without. While they seem to vastly improve flight characteristics at the stall and indeed lower book stall speed, turbulence is turbulence. My patient flyer wife (who gets motion sick very easily) is still grabbing the barf bag from time to time and/or taking ginger pills -- with VG's or sans-VG's.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 05-19-09, 09:40 PM
tropical tropical is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 146
tropical is an unknown quantity at this point
Sorry, no such thing as VG's making a plane "resistant to turbulence".
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 05-19-09, 10:34 PM
CO_Skymaster CO_Skymaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 152
CO_Skymaster is on a distinguished road
Another case of wishful thinking.

Thanks for the information,

Karl
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 05-23-09, 12:04 AM
Roger's Avatar
Roger Roger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FL-NY
Posts: 211
Roger is an unknown quantity at this point
Every female in my family wears the electronic wrist, motion sickness devices, and they swear by them. Get your wife one, tell her you put VG's on the plane and it eliminates motion sickness, and see what happens A little placebo VG flying with the wristbands may do the job.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 05-23-09, 11:22 AM
jchronic jchronic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mass
Posts: 100
jchronic is on a distinguished road
On our marine mammal surveys, we frequently circle in place for 20-30 mins at a time at 30 degree bank angles, so in light/no wind situations we regularly encounter our own wake. Last year, using a 'straight' 337, we got some pretty good jolts after several circles. This year we've been using a 336 with a Robertson (Sierra) STOL kit and the whole crew seems to think the wake turbulence jolts are much milder than last year (in the 337).

Strictly anecdotal and I wouldn't attempt to explain it aerodynamically, but thought I'd offer the info. In any case, I seriously doubt it'd be worth the cost of a conversion for whatever improvement there might be in the ride.
Joe C.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.