Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 07-06-07, 04:44 PM
gkey's Avatar
gkey gkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cold Lake, AB, Canada
Posts: 125
gkey is an unknown quantity at this point
C of G issues

Yesterday I did my first long x-country in GKEY. We flew from Cold Lake (Alberta) to Brandon (Manitoba) and back. Total time 6 hours (940 nm). GKEY performed like an angel.

We never needed to do a C of G in this plane before, because so far it was not needed with just two people in it, but we found something interesting - these are the numbers we used:

Empty weight = 3099 lbs
Pilot = 195 lbs
Front Pax = 165 lbs
Centre seat pax #1 = 147 lbs
Centre seat pax # 2 = 144 lbs
Aft cargo = 35 lbs
Zero Fuel weight = 3785 lbs
Fuel = 780 lbs
Take off weight = 4565 lbs

The max TO WT for this plane is 4630 lbs.

The C of G worked out to be 137.7 which means we were a little outside of the curve to the left, and nose heavy.

Just for giggles, I then worked out a typical C of G with only me and my "first" CFI, who weighed close to 300 lbs, and full fuel 888 lbs. To my surprise, we were then even more left to the curve - 136.7 - and I remember the plane flew just great!

I see in the tech logs that this plane has had several alterations and mods made, like radio's, new seats, new equipment, Robertson STOL kit etc., and each time the C of G was recalculated just by math alone. It has never been physically re-weighed or C of G audited.

Is it possible that the C of G works out left of the curve because of wrong calculations with these many previous mods?
__________________
To the Blue Room!!
Jakes Dekker
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 07-06-07, 05:03 PM
Paul Sharp Paul Sharp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 248
Paul Sharp is an unknown quantity at this point
It's a distinct possibility. You can always get it re-figured. As I remember, it isn't expensive or time-consuming.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 07-07-07, 12:35 AM
Skymaster337B's Avatar
Skymaster337B Skymaster337B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 508
Skymaster337B is an unknown quantity at this point
There is no way you are out of CG. It is almost impossible to exceed the CG of a skymaster. Pay careful attention to units of measurements -- i.e., moment/1000.

And on a side note, you can never bee too nose heavy -- otherwise the airplane would never rotate.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 07-07-07, 01:23 AM
gkey's Avatar
gkey gkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cold Lake, AB, Canada
Posts: 125
gkey is an unknown quantity at this point
My sentiment exactly. I believe the numbers in the tech logs are cooked. I think my best option to to have a C of G audit done on the plane, to get the correct numbers.
__________________
To the Blue Room!!
Jakes Dekker
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 07-07-07, 12:17 PM
Dave Underwood Dave Underwood is offline
N456TL
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: England
Posts: 167
Dave Underwood is on a distinguished road
If the plane has had a number of mods, it is a good idea to get it re-weighed.

Things like new paint, repairs and the like add to the weight continuously.

It is a fast & easy job if you have the scales or know some one who has them.

For example, although I have had much lighter radios installed and had wiring cleaned up etc., the four layers of paint mean the empty weight is now 80 lbs higher than the original Cessna weight & balance.

BTW, you can call Cessna and for a fee they will send you the original equipment list & weight & balance.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 07-07-07, 08:09 PM
DBrugg DBrugg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 25
DBrugg is an unknown quantity at this point
This is a pretty cool W&B calculator.
http://www.skybound.nl/cgi-bin/service/wb/index.cgi
________
ASS ROUND

Last edited by DBrugg : 03-22-11 at 12:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 07-08-07, 07:46 PM
Jerry De Santis's Avatar
Jerry De Santis Jerry De Santis is offline
TAS (Thin Air Seeker)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Battle Creek, Mi
Posts: 457
Jerry De Santis is on a distinguished road
weight

Check your take off weight and fuel weight again. I have a 1975 P337G plane. Max. T.O Wt is 4,700 lbs. Also it hold 150 gallons of fuel. At 6 lbs per gallon. Fuel wt. comes comes to 900 lbs. It appears you noted the max. landing weight and not the T.O. weight.

Jerry
N34EC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 07-08-07, 10:49 PM
gkey's Avatar
gkey gkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cold Lake, AB, Canada
Posts: 125
gkey is an unknown quantity at this point
I wish I did make that mistake, then it was easy to fix.
In my POH, my max TO weight is 4630 lbs (which I used), and the max landing weight is 4400 lbs.

With the 150 gal, 2 gal is unusable, and stays in the plane (as part of the empty weight), thus the full fuel added should read 888 lbs (at least the way I understand it). Even if I did add an extra 12 lbs for the unusable fuel (assuming that it has not been added before), it does not change my CG's at all.

During this trip, we only added the amount of fuel mentioned, to make my CFI feel better.

But still it does not make sense. What are your ususal CG's you get?
__________________
To the Blue Room!!
Jakes Dekker

Last edited by gkey : 07-08-07 at 10:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.