Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Unread 08-02-18, 01:11 AM
dan1000 dan1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Southern California
Posts: 43
dan1000 is on a distinguished road
Plenty of people fly NA over the rocks, and plenty of others fly turbos over the plains. The turbo gives you capabilities the NA doesn't, but also bills the NA doesn't. And they weigh something too.

This pilot's opinion: If flying above 10k feet regularly, a turbo is an extremely nice to have. If flying out of high DA airports, also extremely nice to have.

I think the concerns about climb performance to get over weather, or stranding passengers, are not the right ones. Why? Because if the weather is marginal without turbos, it will still be marginal with turbos. At 17k feet with passengers and fuel, even the turbo aircraft are not climbing more than ~600fpm without getting really hot. So climbing through 3000' of icing means 5 minutes -- long enough to build up a fair bit of ice, which in turn will make that climb even longer.

Bottom line: If you get the turbo, I doubt you'll regret it even if you rarely need it. But it will cost more to buy and maintain. If it were me, I'd buy it, but ... it isn't me, it's you

Dan
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.