Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 08-18-09, 12:12 AM
Ernie Martin's Avatar
Ernie Martin Ernie Martin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 989
Ernie Martin is an unknown quantity at this point
Let me add my 2 cents worth on why not having it is not a big deal.

First, long before you do damage to the engine due to low oil, the prop will feather. I know of at least two cases where this has happened. Loss of oil, prop feathers (which should lead most of us to look at oil pressure), engine gets shut off, no damage.

Second, you've got two engines, so finding a place to land is not the emergency it is with a single.

If you still want to add a low-oil indicator, it may be a lot easier to install and get a field approval on an oil pressure sensor with warning light that simply connects with a T fiitting to the oil-pressure line that now goes to the oil-pressure gauge.

Ernie
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 08-18-09, 10:29 PM
Skymaster337B's Avatar
Skymaster337B Skymaster337B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 509
Skymaster337B is an unknown quantity at this point
I know it's not the same thing, but didn't the O-2 have an oil filler system? So that you could add engine oil during flight. They used it to cross the Pacific.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 08-18-09, 11:32 PM
Ernie Martin's Avatar
Ernie Martin Ernie Martin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 989
Ernie Martin is an unknown quantity at this point
They did have it for the ferry flights, but I don't know that it was part of the standard equipment and retained after they got to Vietnam.

For those of you who don't know the story, it was the in-flight oil filling that caused the only ditching in the many aircraft ferried from the U.S. to Vietnam.

Cessna and/or Continental had calculated/estimated the amount of oil burned per hour by these new engines on these very long flights and instituted a procedure for in-flight refilling. One of these aircraft had one engine that, by sheer luck, had an impossibly perfect set of tolerances and burned much less oil, so the refilling led to excess oil, plug fouling and engine stoppage. Because the aircraft was so overweight with additional fuel for the trip, the remaining engine was unable to maintain altitude and the aircraft was ditched. The pilot was rescued.

Ernie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 08-19-09, 06:04 AM
skymstr02's Avatar
skymstr02 skymstr02 is offline
Ace of the Atmosphere
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Madison, MS
Posts: 329
skymstr02 is an unknown quantity at this point
The inflight oil replenishment system was only installed for the trans-Pacific crossing, it was removed with the ferry fuel tanks on arrival in Saigon.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 08-19-09, 11:50 PM
CO_Skymaster CO_Skymaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 155
CO_Skymaster is on a distinguished road
Ernie,

Thank you for the information. After thinking about that scenario, I agree. When I was losing oil on my rear engine a couple years ago, I could not see the oil spilling out and I never saw a drop in oil pressure. I did start to see the RPM gauge pulsing. I wondered what it was at the time, thinking it was an issue with the gauge or sensor. I never saw it again. It was probably because of the low level of oil.

If I see it again, I'll take it as a warning to land at an airport.

Thanks,

Karl
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.