![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I've owed both. I like the non turbo for it's economy. It's a fuel mizer and matenaince is less...but... I like the turbo. Great climb rates, good cruise. Best of all. I've lost an engine over mountains. It made me nervous in the non turbo. With a turbo you have 23000 on one engine ceilings...so... my two cents. If you don't care too much for the cost.. I take the turbo.
Richard |