|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
MT props, I am so pleased
If you can make it happen you won't be disappointed in the performance, smoothness and response. I have had the MT's for 15 years now, I would do it again. I just purchased a 3 blade for the Van's RV-8A that I am building. There was no question in my mind what prop I wanted on the 8. BUT........this prop has the scimitar blades. The blended airfoil type scimitar blade design is the newest design. Although it has been around for a while now there is none on Skymaster's. I think you could get a field approval and the help of Flight Resource in Wisconsin. I know that John that just bought a Skymaster in Canada has already ordered his MT's but decided the extra money for the scimitar design was out of his budget. The 3 blades have such a great static appearance but the scimitar blade would just expand that appearance 10 times over. Quieter, more efficient design and killer looks. Somebody needs to do it and you are going to have a great performer. Let's see it Robert......I really like talking to John at flight resource.
Flight Resource LLC 2111 W 20th Ave., Unit #12 Bloomer, WI 54724 Attn.: Mr. Larry Schlasinger or John Nielsen
__________________
Herb R Harney 1968 337C Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years 
|
|
#2
04-07-17, 08:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
_________ John K 1977 337G CNC3
|
|
#4
04-07-17, 12:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
_________ John K 1977 337G CNC3
|
|
#5
04-07-17, 02:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
non-scimitar
Larry got back to my email list of questions pretty quick, here is summary:
- could maybe get field approved, but he is working on STC and recommended waiting - said he thinks the current semi-scimitar design is better for cooling on the Skymaster, so suggested that be the pick - if I did upgrade to these 3-blade props and later decided I wanted to do an engine upgrade (something i am considering), then they would likely not be covered - you must do both props at one time (I had asked if you could do 1 at a time, to spread out costs, similar to what I heard Owen Bell has offered in the past) so...unlike Nike, I got to wait it seems....just hope my urge to impulse buy is still around when they get the STC done 
|
|
#6
04-22-17, 05:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
update on prop
Traded more emails with Larry, then we chatted on phone today...
1) doesn't look good to get MT prop STC for my T337C...which we both agreed was weird. So he said he thought he could get field approved, just costs me $1500 more that way. I said that since we were field approving, how about a 4-blade scimitar model? I saw one on a Cirrus SR22T and thought it looked great, plus owner said cooling of 4-blades was good. Larry said the TSIO-360 would not push the 4-blades. Then I dropped back to asking about 3-blade scimitar (per your egging on) since we were field approving...he said that he didn't recommend because of cooling. He said the 119 blades were the ones he suggested be used. 2) different topic, but discussed on phone with him...changing out my engines when doing the props. We talked about going to a single engine turbine pusher, or upgrading both engines similar to Riley STC. Based on cost and other plane options available without the hassle, the Riley (or similar dual bigger engines) seems the more reasonable path. he is going to investigate some. If anyone has good info to lead him in right direction on current STC to either use, or use as basis for field approval, please provide asap.
|
|
#7
04-23-17, 09:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
_________ John K 1977 337G CNC3
|
Hybrid Mode
