Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 02-28-20, 07:36 PM
hharney's Avatar
hharney hharney is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan (8D4)
Posts: 2,266
hharney is on a distinguished road
2350 RPM gives me about 150 - 154 true
I like this setting because my engines seem to just feel better and are smooth
If I'm in a hurry though it's 24-2500 RPM and about 158 - 160 true

Fuel burn, 18 vs 21
__________________
Herb R Harney
1968 337C

Flying the same Skymaster for 47 years
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 02-29-20, 09:02 AM
n86121's Avatar
n86121 n86121 is offline
bigcheese
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Potomac Airfield~!
Posts: 344
n86121 is on a distinguished road
Its all in the curves

The weight of the airplane is 'constant' (at any instant)
That weight W requires an equal amount of lift L to stay aloft
To produce that lift induces a certain amount of drag D

The most efficient flight is in thin air when lift L is 'just enough' to hold the airplane up,
and drag is least (the 'coffin corner' for jets. Efficient but scary).

As throttle opens, airflow becomes more 'laminar'
So at max throttle engine breathes most air/fuel with least disturbance

As one climbs the engine as an air pump cant get enough air
So for fuel/air to remain stochiometric, reduce fuel to match less air

As throttle opens, airflow becomes more 'laminar'
So at max throttle, engine breathes most air/fuel with least disturbance

That's why most non-turbo cruise best around 7-9k feet
Throttle is full open but still getting enough air for available fuel flow
Adding more fuel wont add more power from burn, just richen mixture
Fly higher up and fuel must be reduced to available 02, so HP output drops off

Except for turbo.
But even turbo increases internal combustion 'drag' (energy to spin the turbo is not free).

Most efficient wing moves a lot of air just a little bit
A 'flat' blade at low RPM moves a lot of air a little distance per rotation
So prop efficiency better 'flat' as in takeoff
But delta V across blades (front to back) a function of cruise speed
The idea is to 'paddle' the air with least disturbance

And of course, internal engine friction a function of RPM
Turn the engine two times and it that produces two times the friction per unit of time.

If you can solve all those, you get an 'A.'

--

The only lower limit consideration I have read has to do with the internal harmonic balancing of the engine. Spin too slow and harmonics increase vibration in some manner. Which of course consumes energy as heat, not output.

E=MC^2
F=Mass x Acceleration
K=1/2 Mass *Velocity ^2

Those aren't just good ideas, they are the law.
__________________
David Wartofsky
Potomac Airfield
10300 Glen Way
Fort Washington, MD 20744
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.