![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
That's a good candidate for an "Bush 336." Put some fat tires on it with a field approval, slap a Horton STOL kit on the leading edge, and go have fun.
__________________
1969 T337E |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Its a good candidate for a multiengine time builder too. Once you get your ME rating, Skymaster time goes into the "multi" column just like all the other ME airplanes!
What would the fuel burn be with both motors pulled back to 2200 rpm? Maybe 16 GPH? Last edited by mshac : 11-17-20 at 11:43 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Depends on the MP. The 337 POHs have an entry for 2200/18" @ 12gph. I don't see why you can't do that with the 336.
__________________
1969 T337E Last edited by mshac : 11-17-20 at 11:44 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Oh my - But the engines are old and scary! "That's why you have two, mam". ![]() Last edited by mshac : 11-17-20 at 11:52 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Both engines were overhauled before the VAR crank AD. I'm guessing that the way to have this plane make sense is to buy it, fly it until you HAVE to open a case, and then part it out. You'd probably manage under $100/flight hour all-in if you can assist with annuals.
__________________
1969 T337E |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
They're time capsules!
__________________
1969 T337E |