![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A SeaDog
I agree with Timcote1960,
I have a P337H with the Riley 520 engines and love it. Floats are super drag and performance becomes relative. I want to get a 336 or another 337 and put it on floats. I crashed into SF Bay in 1986 in a Rockwell 112TC and it changed my religion on single engine airplanes. I see the higher fuel flow as insurance for safety and perhaps a composite rear prop will take care of the eating of props? DanChad |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Now lets talk about your Super Skyrocket... ![]() Last edited by DanChad : 07-27-21 at 06:25 PM. Reason: Sure, and tell me what you think of my idea of a rear composite prop? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I was just talking to someone in Alaska who said there is a still a 336 up there on floats. I didn't get a chance to see it personally, so I can't confirm.
__________________
1969 T337E |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
No 336/337 on Floats in AK
I have a P337H Skymaster with the Riley conversion with 520 engines.
I know of no 336/337 on floats, I was just saying I like the idea for the safety of having two engines and the extra fuel flow would be just insurance |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
With all that drag, would a Seamaster be able to maintain altitude, much less climb, one on engine?
|