Skymaster Forum  

Go Back   Skymaster Forum > Messages
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 05-12-25, 01:22 PM
Cglencross's Avatar
Cglencross Cglencross is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Canada
Posts: 26
Cglencross is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdrob1985 View Post
Let’s hope, based on aircraft weight and performance that they actually do with the GFC 600 and not the 500. If they do come through on a solution.
I'm not sure why you need the 600. We don't need rudder bias and there are many planes out there that are approved that have equal or better performance than the 337. In addition, they have already approved the PA-34 and PA-30 so twins with asymmetric thrust are okay.

The only benefit of the 600 that I can see is you don't need a GI-275 (when I spoke with them they where not going to approve it with the G5).

Is there something I'm missing?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 06-13-25, 01:02 PM
hayesjaj hayesjaj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 73
hayesjaj is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cglencross View Post
I'm not sure why you need the 600. We don't need rudder bias and there are many planes out there that are approved that have equal or better performance than the 337. In addition, they have already approved the PA-34 and PA-30 so twins with asymmetric thrust are okay.

The only benefit of the 600 that I can see is you don't need a GI-275 (when I spoke with them they where not going to approve it with the G5).

Is there something I'm missing?
The 600 has more powerful actuators. A critical performance demonstration is required for certification where a test pilot takes the aircraft to maximum altitude, puts it in a dive (I think to some high % of VNE) and then commands an autopilot recovery. One of the Garmin engineers told me a few years ago they were concerned about the control forces required with the higher gross weight aircraft (think 4650 or 4700 for later models). I guess there were some issues with 210s in this regard. I know Senecas are just below that weight but their control forces are a little lighter than 210s/337s.

I've flown the 500 in 182s and 210s and can confirm it struggles a little bit with the heavier 210, at least in the examples I flew. Its brilliant in the 182 so hopefully they can make it work.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.